Dissemination
- Workshops
- Past Workshops
- Schools and Seminars
- International Collaboration
- Publications
- Contributions to Standards
- Course Materials Available Online
OSPERT 2009
| June 30th, 2009 Dublin, Ireland (in conjunction with ECRTS09) | organised and funded by ARTIST |
Participants
24 participants, from Austria, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, the USA.
| Jason Agron, University of Arkansas, USA James Anderson, University of North-Carolina at Chapel Hills USA David Andrews, University of Arkansas, USA Mikael Åsberg, Maelardalen University, Sweden Theodore Baker, Florida State University, USA Morris Behnam, Maelardalen University, Sweden Björn Brandenburg, University of North-Carolina at Chapel Hills, USA Scott Brandt, University of California at Santa Cruz, USA Reinder J. Bril, TU Eindhofen, Netherlands Fabio Checconi, SSSUP, Italy Romulo de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil Dario Faggioli, SSSUP, Italy Thomas Gleixner, Linuxtronix, Germany Hermann Härtig, TU Dresden, Germany Luis Henriques, Intel Shannon, Ireland Mike Holenderski, TU Eindhofen, Netherlands Malcolm Mollison, University of North-Carolina at Chapel Hills, USA Nicholas Mc Guire, OpenTech, Austria Yukikazu Nakamoto, University of Hyogo, Japan Farhang Nemati, Maelardalen University, Sweden Thomas Nolte, Maelardalen University, Sweden Stefan M. Petters, ISEP IPP, Portugal Björn Pietsch, Universitaet Hannover, Germany Peter Zijlstra, Red Hat, Netherlands |
The workshop provided the platform for theoreticians and practitioners in real-time operating systems design to meet and discuss. The presentations were well received and generated substantial discussions on the topics presented. Of particular interest was the panel discussion which focussed on what lessons academics can learn from the Linux community and vice versa. Of particular concern of the Linux community was that the real-time guarantees may not be bought with a disproportionate performance hit, which unfortunately is too often the case in academic solutions. On the other hand stressed the academic community that particular care needs to be taken to ensure the correctness of real-time solutions implemented.
The last session of the workshop was devoted to a discussion of the issues surrounding a real-time testbed to enable comparison of scheduling approaches, as well as evaluate the cost of primitives proposed by the academic community. The discussion covered areas of difficulties as well as opportunities and had a critical look at past approaches.
(c) Artist Consortium, All Rights Reserved - 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009